<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter &amp; Seesmic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bewarethegeek.edublogs.org/2009/04/18/twitter-seesmic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bewarethegeek.edublogs.org/2009/04/18/twitter-seesmic/</link>
	<description>E-Learning Experiences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bewarethegeek</title>
		<link>http://bewarethegeek.edublogs.org/2009/04/18/twitter-seesmic/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>bewarethegeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bewarethegeek.edublogs.org/?p=19#comment-13</guid>
		<description>The sending to two people thing is definitely something that would be useful for twitter. Or whole groups of people. Even if you can&#039;t do it through a standard tweet, surely it wouldn&#039;t be difficult to allow multiple recipient DMs - I mean the technology is obviously there, it&#039;s basically an email within the system with a character limit enforced. I wonder why they haven&#039;t done it actually. That said, with the number of &quot;over capacity&quot; messages I&#039;m seeing lately I think they&#039;re too busy just keeping up with the number of people joining let alone adding new features :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sending to two people thing is definitely something that would be useful for twitter. Or whole groups of people. Even if you can&#8217;t do it through a standard tweet, surely it wouldn&#8217;t be difficult to allow multiple recipient DMs &#8211; I mean the technology is obviously there, it&#8217;s basically an email within the system with a character limit enforced. I wonder why they haven&#8217;t done it actually. That said, with the number of &#8220;over capacity&#8221; messages I&#8217;m seeing lately I think they&#8217;re too busy just keeping up with the number of people joining let alone adding new features <img src='http://bewarethegeek.edublogs.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mollybob</title>
		<link>http://bewarethegeek.edublogs.org/2009/04/18/twitter-seesmic/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>mollybob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 07:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bewarethegeek.edublogs.org/?p=19#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Glad to see you&#039;re trying out a client. Sometimes I don&#039;t use my client (Tweetdeck for the moment) when I want things to be static. Usually when I&#039;m doing an assignment and the like. It&#039;s weird how we warm to certain ways of doing and seeing things. You&#039;re not alone there.

Just yesterday I wanted to send something to two people.  I wonder if there&#039;s any way it can occur through a client? Hmmm... I&#039;ll ask the twitterverse, but not holding my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see you&#8217;re trying out a client. Sometimes I don&#8217;t use my client (Tweetdeck for the moment) when I want things to be static. Usually when I&#8217;m doing an assignment and the like. It&#8217;s weird how we warm to certain ways of doing and seeing things. You&#8217;re not alone there.</p>
<p>Just yesterday I wanted to send something to two people.  I wonder if there&#8217;s any way it can occur through a client? Hmmm&#8230; I&#8217;ll ask the twitterverse, but not holding my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

